A live account, checkable on-chain.
This is the Rubik trading system running on a single Hyperliquid account, with its results measured the same way week after week. Every figure is computed from that account; open it on the explorer and compare.
Live since 13 Jul 2026 · Trading days 64 / 64
The Rubik pool is built to run the same system. How the two relate →- Return since start
- +24.8%
- Closed positions
- 260
- Profitable positions
- 69.2%
- Trading days
- 64 / 64
- Live since
- 13 Jul 2026
time-weighted · deposits excluded · after fees and funding
flat-to-flat, counted from 23 Jul
share of closed positions above zero
no missed days
first real order
| Stage | Capital | Return | Per month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test budget · under $2k · 13 Jul – 21 Aug | $495 → $1,106 | +13.1% | +10.2% · 38d |
| Since $2k · 21 Aug – to date | $1,106 → $6,556 | +10.7% | +13.3% · 24d |
Split by account size rather than by calendar month, because size changes how the system can work: below $2,000 it cannot spread across instruments and both execution accounts. The stages differ in length, so the last column normalises each one to 30 days — without it the shorter stage looks worse than it is.
A closed position is one flat-to-flat cycle, not a single fill — a cycle usually closes in several partial reductions. Return is time-weighted, so capital added along the way does not inflate it. Drawdown, holding time and every individual fill are not restated here: the account is public, so they can be read from the chain itself.
Past results do not guarantee future ones. Trading leveraged derivatives can lose all of the capital deposited.
Last updated 15 Sep 2026
The pool is built to run the same system.
This record belongs to a single trading account run by the operator. The Rubik pool is built to run the same system under the same rules, on its own accounts. It is not a different strategy — and it is not the same account, so its results will not be identical to these.
- Carries over
- The trading logic, the instruments and every risk control described on this site.
- Will differ
-
- When you join: a deposit joins new trades only, not trades already open.
- Account size: a larger book trades differently; the planning rates for larger accounts are modelled, not observed.
- Fees: the pool charges a performance fee above your own high-water mark, which is not in the figures above.
- Structure: this record is one account; the pool trades through its own accounts.
The pool, in its own numbers.
The pool is in beta on mainnet and has no published results yet. This block will show the pool's own week-by-week results in the same format as the reference account, starting with its first weekly settlement. Until then, nothing on this page is a pool result.
What this record does not tell you.
- Past results
- Past results do not guarantee future ones. These figures are a record of what happened, not a forecast and not a planning rate.
- Length
- The record is short and covers one market period. It has not been through every kind of market.
- Size
- It was made at account sizes between the figures in the stage table. A larger account trades differently; the rates for larger accounts on the home page are modelled, not observed.
- One plane
- The reference account is one of two execution planes. The other plane has a shorter record.
- Unit of count
- Positions are flat-to-flat cycles, not fills. The explorer lists several times more fills than this page lists positions, because a position usually closes in several reductions.
- Delay
- Figures are a snapshot refreshed periodically, and the page shows when. The chain is the live source — if the two differ, the chain is right.
- Drawdown
- Maximum drawdown is not published: no single owner computes it for the trading system.
Check it yourself.
View the account on Hyperliquid explorer 0x66f7cbda18a9c50a749b6b868f251e30e61ec803- 1 · Open the account
- Open the account on the Hyperliquid explorer. The address is the one shown here, and nothing is hidden behind it.
- 2 · Compare the return
- Compare the account's equity change with "Return since start". Deposits and withdrawals are removed from our figure, so look at the transfers in the account history.
- 3 · Count closing fills, not positions
- The explorer shows more rows than the "Closed positions" tile, for the reason given under Limits.
How each number is measured.
Published figures come from the owners that compute them for the trading system itself, not from arithmetic applied to the page. Where a figure has no owner, it is not published.
Numbers on this page are refreshed daily from the live trading instance. The date above the account link is the date of the last refresh.
- Closed position
- One flat-to-flat cycle: from opening an instrument to holding none of it again. A cycle normally closes in several partial reductions, so counting fills would multiply the number several times over and measure rebalances rather than trades. The count starts on 23 July 2026, when full position-level attribution began; the first ten days of live trading are on-chain but are not restated here.
- Time-weighted return
- Return with external transfers removed, so deposits and withdrawals move neither the figure up nor down. Equity growth on its own is not a return: most of the balance you see on-chain was deposited, not earned.
- Profitable
- Share of closed positions that ended above zero after fees and funding. Open positions are never counted as wins.
- Costs
- Figures are after trading fees and funding paid by the account and before the pool's performance fee, whose rate is set in the participant terms.
- Trading days
- Days on which the system was live, against calendar days since the first real order. A missed day would show here as a gap.
- Not published
- Maximum drawdown, average holding time and per-trade detail. Maximum drawdown is not published because no single owner computes it for the trading system; the account is public, so anyone can derive these from the chain rather than take our restatement of them.